Hackers these days are increasingly targeting lawyers & law firms to hack confidential info, including pending business deals, trade secrets, and personal data. These cyber attacks have resulted in a significant increase in data breaches compromising confidential info of clients at firm of all sizes. As per the ABA (American Bar Association) 2017 Legal Technology Survey, nearly 22% of law firms reported data violationat some point of time.
Security breaches in law firms weren’t confined to only bigger firms that are expected to have more valuable data. Law firms of all sizes, including solo practitioners have undergone data violations.
These ever increasing threats are changing constantly and are limited only by the creative minds of the cyber criminals. While there have always been legal practices for safeguarding clients’ data from such threats, this accountability has been made even clearers by the proceeding of American Bar Association opinion 483.
The ABA Opinion 483 refers to 5 key rules including:
Model Rule 1.1: A lawyer should offer competent representation to a client by exercising the essential skill, legal knowledge and preparation required for the representation.
Model Rule 1.4: In the event of a data breach lawyers should keep their clients reasonably informed. Proper explanation is a must to permit the client to take informed decisions about the representation.
Model Rule 1.6: Under this clause the lawyers mustn’t disclose info associated to the representation of a client except the client provides informed approval.
Model Rule 5.1: It’s the accountability of the lawyer to execute all essential steps to make sure right measures are in place abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct.
The ABA Opinion 483 refers to 5 key rules including:
Model Rule 1.1: A lawyer should offer competent representation to a client by exercising the essential skill, legal knowledge and preparation required for the representation.
Model Rule 1.4: In the event of a data breach lawyers should keep their clients reasonably informed. Proper explanation is a must to permit the client to take informed decisions about the representation.
Model Rule 1.6: Under this clause the lawyers mustn’t disclose info associated to the representation of a client except the client provides informed approval.
Model Rule 5.1: It’s the accountability of the lawyer to execute all essential steps to make sure right measures are in place abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Model Rule 5.3: Needs that lawyer in decision-making authorities make genuine efforts to make sure that any non-lawyer’s conduct is attuned with the professional obligations of the lawyer.
CompCiti has a crew of cybersecurity & compliance regulation experts who comprehend the details of American Bar Association opinion 483to serve clients. CompCiti service package makes sure law firms not just meet the benchmark set by ABA opinion 483 but harness the cons of following the obligations to boost clients’ confidence in their offerings. CompCiti is in the IT sphere for more than two decades, and combines IT expertise with cyber security knowledge to offer its clients the most holistic solutions out there. Get in touch with CompCiti now to know how CompCiti can protect your company from cyber threats.
Disclaimer: This content is created and provided by a third-party online content writer on behalf of CompCiti, and is for commercial purposes only. CompCiti does not take any responsibility on the accuracy of this article.
